youre still in the running. . How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? In all cases, authors are expected to abide by the Nature Research press and embargo policies. On submission, the manuscript is assigned to an editor covering the subject area, who seeks informal advice from scientific advisors and editorial colleagues, and who makes this initial decision. The peer review file is published online as a supplementary peer review file. Is it possible to create a concave light? Nature Neuroscience Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) Either rejection or sending it out for review. section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection The journal opened for submissions on April 20, 2016. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? If appropriate, delegate parts of the response to one or more of the co-authors. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. Is it possible to rotate a window 90 degrees if it has the same length and width? var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. . At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". I submitted a MS to a Nature-Branded Journal on 9/10 and today the status changed to "Editor Decision Started". One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper. Nature (Nature) How long should I wait for a response from the journal? We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. [CDATA[// > One perk, however, is having the choice and control over what I . I have experience with the manuscript submission process, from submission to peer review, to acceptance/rejection. Dont infer anything from unavailable data. In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. The titles of forthcoming papers will be listed on the mailing, along with the corresponding authors' contact details, which means authors may receive media enquiries relating to their paper during this embargo period. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. . Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? Thanks! Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. How can we prove that the supernatural or paranormal doesn't exist? How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. What is the pressure of nitrous oxide cylinder? var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. Although optional, the cover letter is an excellent opportunity to briefly discuss the importance of the submitted work and why it is appropriate for the journal. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. Press J to jump to the feed. That's it . All Rights Reserved. Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? What could this mean? Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. I am faced with the same situation right now. //--> Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. The initial judgement is not a reflection on the technical validity of the work described, or on its importance to people in the same field. The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. Sometimes they are more busy. Sometimes they are more busy. The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. Do the revisions and resubmit. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in if you strongly disagree with the editorial decision, you can appeal against it unless the editor has clearly specified otherwise. I am at the same stage. This is known as a rescinding. Read the entire letter, including all of the reviewers comments and the editors explanations (if any). A decision by the editor in chief is the . The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. If a paper was rejected because the authors failed to persuade the referees that they had excluded alternative interpretations, then new data or analyses are likely to be required for the appeal to have any chance of success. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. Click to reveal In addition, most authors are genuinely excited about their work, and usually submit to Nature Neuroscience because they believe that the paper deserves high-profile publication. If your article is accepted, it could take anywhere from a few months to three years for the journal to publish your piece. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. What does this mean and should I contact the editor? This referees opinion must be satisfied for the manuscript to be published, but as this referee may not know about the field concerned, an endorsement in isolation from the other referee(s) would not constitute grounds for publication. resubmitnoveltyappeal, Resubmitpoint-by-pointresponse letterresubmitresponse letterresubmitresponse letternature, Proofreadingresubmit, Proofreadinglicence to publish, NatureNatureNature, wileynature science, Nature CommunicationsNatureNature CommunicationsPeer-review, Nature Communicationstransparent peer-reviewgetNature Communicationsget50%Nature Communicaitons, sciencenature. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. So in conclusion, yes, editors can add reviews but should do so with extreme caution and rarity. Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. Cloudflare Ray ID: 7a2b13d3eec43de7 How did it go for you after this? Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. EDIT: As Strongbad points out in a comment the term Awaiting Editors Decision strictly indicates that the paper has passed reviewers. //--> Informe De Logros Y Dificultades De Aprendizaje Nivel Primaria, Gemini Ascendant 2022, Articles E